The Rennes objective disallowed for a purpose you nearly by no means see


There was confusion in final evening’s Europa League conflict between Rennes and Villarreal because the VAR disallowed the hosts’ equaliser within the one hundred and first minute.

Lorenz Assignon thought he had scored the objective to ship the French aspect prime of Group F, a outcome that will have despatched them straight by way of to the final 16.

However, to the bewilderment of him and his team-mates, a VAR intervention chalked it off.

Villarreal held on for all three factors, consigning Rennes to a second-place end and a spot within the Europa League knockout spherical play-off.

So, what occurred?

Because the second half went into its tenth minute of stoppage time, after a minimal of six had been added on, Enzo Le Charge stood over a free kick simply outdoors the Villarreal penalty space along with his aspect dealing with a 3-2 deficit.

His strike beat opposition goalkeeper Pepe Reina however got here crashing again off the submit and bounced again by way of the ocean of gamers — crucially, with out touching any of them — and again to the ft of the free-kick taker…

Rennes Villarreal grab 2
Rennes Villarreal grab 3

Le Charge’s try and play the ball again into the field was blocked, however it was ultimately recycled to Ibrahim Salah out on the left wing. His cross was solely cleared so far as Assignon a yard or two from the penalty spot and the 23-year-old hammered a first-time effort previous Reina, sending his team-mates and the house supporters wild within the perception they’d carried out sufficient to prime the group.

However, simply over a minute later, Turkish referee Atilla Karaoglan signalled that the objective had been dominated out after a reasonably swift VAR examine. The confusion arose as a result of the VAR examine indicated that an offside infringement had occurred, leaving commentators and followers alike in search of the offside on the replays.

Why was the objective dominated out?

The Worldwide Soccer Affiliation Board (IFAB), the sport’s lawmakers, states of their free-kick guidelines (Regulation 13.3) that:

“If, after the ball is in play, the kicker touches the ball once more earlier than it has touched one other participant, an oblique free kick (or direct free kick for a handball offence) is awarded to the opposing workforce, to be taken from the place the place the infringement occurred.”

As Le Charge was the primary participant to the touch the ball after his free kick had struck the body of the objective, that rule got here into play. Had the ball touched another participant on the pitch, by chance or intentionally, earlier than coming again to Le Charge, a ensuing objective would have been allowed to face.

You is perhaps aware of the identical rule making use of to penalty kicks. Regulation 14.2 states:

“If, after the penalty kick has been taken, the kicker touches the ball once more earlier than it has touched one other participant, an oblique free kick (or direct free kick for a handball offence) is awarded.”

If that penalty kick is saved by the goalkeeper, then the ball is as soon as once more energetic for the taker, who’s permitted to take the rebound.

What was the response?

After the match, Rennes supervisor Julien Stephan admitted that he had not been conscious of the rule concerning free kicks.

“I additionally realized (this rule) at the moment,” he stated. “I knew it was the case from the penalty spot, however I didn’t suppose it existed from a free kick.”

His reverse quantity, Villarreal supervisor Marcelino, was requested in regards to the disallowed objective.

“I used to be considering that nothing goes proper (earlier than) after they disallowed the objective,” he stated. “We had probabilities to place ourselves 4-2 up. It’s soccer.”

(Prime picture: TNT Sports activities)


Supply hyperlink